Tuesday, March 29, 2011

The Best Commodities to Hedge Inflation

The Best Commodities to Hedge Inflation : "Commodities are a hedge against inflation!" We've all heard the advice—and if we say it often enough, then it must be true. But while commodities are a market most investors should have at least some exposure to, claiming the entire asset class will act as a strong inflation hedge is seriously misleading. But hey, I suppose it makes a nice little sound bite.

Of course, to some degree, commodities as a whole are a hedge against inflation, insofar as any useful thing will have some functional worth, regardless of the currency in which it's priced. But when it comes to inflation hedging, not all commodities are created equal.

So which commodity—or class of commodity—actually provides the best hedge against U.S. dollar inflation?

Hedging By The Numbers
To answer this question, I've selected a representative commodity from each of the most common categories—energy, softs, grains, metals, livestock and even lumber—and run a full regression analysis, comparing their daily prices with the U.S. dollar/Swiss franc exchange rate over the last five years (2005 - present).[1] (Why the USD/CHF exchange rate? Of all the possible currency pairs, I think USD/CHF acts as the best gauge of the worth of the U.S. dollar, given the stability of the Swiss economy, coupled with its rock-solid banking industry and high global economic standing.)

For the statistically un-inclined, "R_squared" is a measure of the extent to which the change in value of one factor can be explained by the change in value of another. In this case, it tells us how much of the returns for our representative commodities can be explained by their correlation to the dollar. (A negative correlation, by the way, implies that one factor goes up when the other declines, while a positive value means the two move in the same direction. No correlation means the values move independently of each other.)

One thing to keep in mind, however, is that both currencies and commodities tend to possess cyclical, time-series correlations. So you shouldn't take this analysis to mean that commodity x and commodity y are and will forever be correlated to the dollar by some set amount. Instead, this analysis should offer a general base of comparison between the commodities themselves.

Take a look at the results, and see for yourself which commodities truly do provide the best inflation hedge.

Energy
Representative: Crude Oil
Correlation Type: Negative
R_Squared: 0.3119
Gold
Surprised? So was I. Given the much-ballyhooed oil-dollar link, I fully expected the two to exhibit a much closer statistical relationship.

However, previous analyses I've done comparing oil prices to the dollar have revealed that the oil-dollar correlation has grown much stronger throughout 2008 and 2009 (which offered R_Squareds of .5692 and .8374, respectively). This may be due, at least in part, to a changing global economic climate; as emerging powers modernize, they are bound to consume more oil.

Therefore, although oil may not have been the best inflation hedge for most of the previous decade, as oil becomes a more important ingredient in the vitality of emerging economies, such as China and India, look for this relationship to strengthen.

Grains
Representative: Corn
Correlation Type: Negative
R_Squared: 0.5417
Corn
The most American of grains turns out to be a fairly reasonable hedge against inflation in the dollar. And since America grows most of the world's corn, that makes perfect sense.

One thing to keep in mind, however, is that corn's primary use the world over is in livestock feed. If American corn prices get too high or the dollar becomes too strong (or both), farmers in other nations would be happy to switch to a cheaper, non-American and/or noncorn-feed for their livestock, thereby decreasing world corn demand and inevitably, the value of a bushel of corn. So before going long corn to hedge the dollar, be sure to consider the fungible nature of feed grains.

Meats/Livestock
Representative: Pork Bellies
Correlation Type: Positive
R_Squared: 0. 2977
Pork Bellies
Note: Due to the unavailability of reliable prices, the sample size for pork bellies prices is somewhat smaller (8/29/06 - 1/21/2010).

Sure, pork bellies are perhaps not the first choice proxy for livestock in general, insofar as the market's open interest and volume are perpetually an order of magnitude below that of cattle. But come on, who doesn't like bacon?

As you can see, pork bellies are slightly positively correlated with the U.S. dollar. I pulled up the USDA's most recent WASDE report to get an idea of why this might be, and immediately found my answer: In 2009, United States farms produced an estimated 23.07 billion pounds of pork, exporting about 4.18 billion pounds while importing only 841 million. It seems the global pork market is not one in which the United States has any interest in participating; we like to keep our bacon right here in the good old US of A. (Although the hit pork exports took during last year's "swine flu" fiasco may have played a part in the low export numbers as well.)

So next time you order a BLT, feel free to cancel out your gluttony guilt by taking pride in supporting a home-grown industry. But just don't think about hedging inflation with a pork bellies contract.

Precious Metals
Representative: Gold
Correlation Type: Negative
R_Squared: 0.7357
Gold
As expected, gold and the dollar are inversely linked at the hip. Nothing particularly surprising here, as everyone and their mother knows that these two tend to move in opposite directions. The shiny metal is your textbook inflation hedge.

Non-Precious Metals
Representative: Copper
Correlation Type: Negative
R_Squared: 0.1039
Copper
Copper has been one of the major, if not the major, inputs in every industry in history, from the eponymous copper age (before alloying was invented) right up to the digital age. So the small correlation between the dollar and copper may come as a surprise.

Historically, copper prices rise as global industry expands and falls during global recessionary periods, so perhaps the lack of a serious correlation is the result of copper being too useful and abundant to provide any hedge whatsoever. Because the Earth is literally teeming with the stuff, we don't feel the need to melt it down into ingots and hoard it in vaults. Instead, if and when demand arises, it's easy enough to just dig it out of the ground.

Forest Products
Representative: Random-Length Lumber
Correlation Type: Positive
R_Squared: 0.3777
Lumber
Like pork bellies, lumber is a largely internal market, in that the U.S. uses almost all the lumber it grows. However, because we also import so much of the stuff from Canada, it is better to think of lumber not as an exclusively U.S. market, but as a North American market.

In 2008, for example, the U.S. produced 29.18 billion board feet of lumber, while Canada produced 23.65 billion board feet, according to the Western Wood Products Association's Lumber Track Magazine. We exported only 295 million board feet to Canada, while importing 11.62 billion board feet from Canada—nearly half of the country's yearly production. At the same time, U.S. imports and exports from non-Canadian countries both remained low, at 1.06 billion board feet and 729 million board feet, respectively.

In that context, lumber would only make a good inflation hedge if the currency you're hedging has the queen on one side and a bird on the other.

Softs
Representative: Coffee
Correlation Type: Negative
R_Squared: 0.5469
Coffee
Note: Due to the unavailability of reliable prices, the sample size for coffee prices is somewhat smaller (9/19/06 - 1/21/2010).

Coffee is one of the world's most traded and active commodities; everyone everywhere drinks coffee every day, and it only grows in a few select regions. Its status as a truly global commodity with an active market is what makes it a reasonable hedge against dollar inflation. Coffee seems to be the one luxury that people won't give up, even when times get tough; the U.S. even included coffee in its relief supplies during the Berlin airlift. That should say something about the strength of our collective addiction.

As we can see, if your goal is to hedge against dollar inflation, blindly investing in a broad basket of commodities may not be your best option. It pays to be choosy.

If your main investment goal is to protect against the dollar's devaluation, then opting for precious metals (namely, gold) over base metals, livestock and even lumber make a great deal of sense. But you can diversify that position somewhat with an appropriately weighted collection of precious metals, grains and softs (especially coffee) to help you achieve your goal.

Full Disclosure: As of writing, author is short March 2010 softwood lumber (LBH10).
Reade more >>

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Tips to track the oil price using exchange traded funds (ETFs)

Best commodities - Tips to track the oil price using exchange traded funds (ETFs) : Investors wanting to track the soaring oil price with exchange traded funds (ETFs) should take care. Choose the wrong ETF and you could be wasting your time and money.

Regulator is concerned

The Financial Services Authority last month announced it was stepping up its supervision of exchange traded products (such as exchange traded funds or ETFs, and exchange traded commodities or ETCs) over concerns that investors did not always understand these complex financial instruments.

Interest in ETFs as a generally cost-efficient way of tracking individual stock markets and investment sectors has soared in recent years. At the same time the trebling of the oil price since 2009 has made oil ETFs a popular play for investors seeking to cash in on the global boom in commodities.

Oil trackers that don't track

However, as the chart below shows, the range of oil ETFs from the main provider in this area – ETF Securities – has produced widely differing results, even though in theory they all track Brent Oil, one of two main measures of the oil price.

Best Commodities

The chart shows that since October 2007, when ETFS launched its exchange traded commodities on the London Stock Exchange, the ETFS Brent 1 month oil ETF has massively underperformed the price of oil. It also shows that none of the ETFs here have kept up with the recent rises in oil prices.

Why?

On the face of it tracking oil prices shouldn't be difficult because the 'spot price' of oil – the price we hear about every day – is the price of oil futures contracts. Although futures contracts are high risk investments, they can be bought like any other assets such as bonds, shares and gold. So why doesn't owning them enable an investor to track their price effectively?

The ETFS Brent 1mth in the chart is an oil ETF that owns futures contracts for one month. As the chart shows, it doesn't do a great job keeping up with the price. The other ETFs are the ETFS Brent 1yr, which buys and hold futures contracts for a year, the ETFS Brent 2yr which holds futures contracts for two years and the ETFS Brent 3yr which owns them for three years.

As the chart shows, the more infrequently these ETFs recycle their futures contracts, the better their over-all performance. However none of them have kept up with oil price increases seen over the last few months.

The illusion

The problem investors need to get their heads around is that there is no continuous oil price. Oil futures, which are the basis of the oil 'spot price', can be bought as much as nine years ahead of a specified delivery date. However, they only represent the 'spot price' for one month in that period.

This all-important month is the last one before the delivery date, which is when the buyer of the futures contract will see his paper contract transformed into 1,000 barrels of oil. This last month is used as a proxy for the price of oil and it is known as the 'front month'.

The problem for ‘buy-and-hold’ investors is that attempts to capture this ‘front month’ price means buying and owning futures contracts for that one month before they expire. In other words they have to recycle their holdings 100% each month in order to keep up with the price. This ‘rolling’ of futures contracts is expensive and can wipe out any gains investors have made on the oil price.

An ETF trying to do this job faces the same problem. Rolling contracts can be particularly expensive if the market is in a state of contango, a term that means the contracts are more expensive to buy today than to sell in the future. (The opposite condition, when contracts are cheaper to buy today than sell in the future, is called backwardation will make money for an investor.)

Asd a result an ETF that holds onto its futures contracts for longer periods can reduce its costs but will no longer be tracking the ‘spot price’ of oil.

What should I do?

Different oil ETFs suit different kinds of investors. In general an investor using the one month oil ETF will be interested in short-term accuracy, not a long-term investment. For example, if an investor believes that Saudi Arabia will soon become embroiled in an Egypt or Libya-style uprising they will buy the 1 month oil ETF because it will most accurately reflect an impact on the price of oil. But if this event happens a few months later than they expected, the gains in price may have been wiped out by the cost to the ETF of 'rolling' its contracts.

But if an investor takes the view that the demand for oil will continue to rise and that supply is not likely to suddenly increase, then they may prefer an ETF that reflects long-term investor sentiment. These are the ETFs which own futures contracts for longer periods.

There are plenty of other ways of investing in themes like energy some of which can be found in Citywire Selection's specialist section and in the commodities section where you will find our analysts' favourite funds, ETFs and investment trusts.

A number of funds focus on the energy theme like Investec Global Energy, Guinesss Global Energy and Martin Currie Global Energy but they have all underperformed the Brent Crude 'spot price' in various degrees since April 2009 and some have under performed the 1 month ETF.

Another approach is to invest directly into oil producing companies whose share prices are influenced by the price of oil. The large ones like Shell and BP tend to be less volatile compared to the smaller ones. However there is a greater risk when investing in a single company rather than a global commodity, as demonstrated by BP.

Know what you're investing in

While oil ETFs may provide investors with a tighter focus on oil prices, an investor should get comfortable with how futures markets work and why an ETF will always face problems tracking them.

Nick Brooks, head of research at ETF Securities, said that information on the products was available from their factsheets which can be found on the company's website. He said that if investors had further questions they should look at the prospectus, also available on the website.

Brooks said: 'It's like buying any investment product whether its a bank account, a bond or an equity, you do the due diligence and read the descriptions of what you're buying.It's the same as buying shares in IBM, the very least you would do would be to visit the company website and work out what it does.'

He added that 80-90% of the money in ETF Securities oil products came from professional investors and that most of their cash went into the 1 month ETF because their investment horizons were rarely more than six months. However, he said that in terms of getting the best return for the risk to your money, the longer-dated ETFs were generally a better bet for longer-term investors.
source citywire.co.uk ...
Reade more >>